References

1. A. Cornell, Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 58, 1583-1606, 1968; L. Reiter, Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights, Columbia University Press, New York, 254 pp., 1990.
2. For a summary of seismic attenuation and site-response relationships, see the collection of papers introduced by N. A. Abrahamson & K. M. Shedlock, Seismol. Res. Lett., 68, 9-23, 1997.
3. E. H. Field, Modified ground-motion attenuation relationship for Southern California that accounts for detailed site classification and a basin-depth effect, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90, S209-S221, 2000.
4. E. H. Field and the SCEC Phase III Working Group, Accounting for site effects in probabilistic seismic hazard analyses of Southern California: Overview of the SCEC Phase III report, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90, S1-S31, 2000.
5. For a comprehensive discussion of the SCEC scientific framework, see http://www.scec.org/scec2/.
6. See discussion of Computational Seismology on p. 15 of the President's Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC), Information Technology for the 21st Century: A Bold Investment in America's Future, White House, Washington, D.C., 35 pp., 1999 (http://www.ccic.gov/it2/initiative.pdf).
7. D. Wald, V. Quitoriano, T. Heaton, H. Kanamori, C. W. Scrivner & C. B. Worden, Earthquake Spectra, 15, 537-556, 1999; http://www.trinet.org/shake.
8. HAZUS®99 Estimated Annualized Earthquake Losses for the United States, Federal Emergency Management Agency Report 366, Washington, D.C., September, 2000, 32 pp (http://www.fema.gov/pdf/FEMA366.pdf).
9. A. Frankel, C. Mueller, T. Barnhard, D. Perkins, E. V. Leyendecker, N. Dickman, S. Hanson, and M. Hopper, National seismic hazard maps: documentation, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 96-352, 1996.
10. S. N. Ward, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 22,393-22,418; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90, 370-386, 2000; J. B. Rundle, W. Klein, K.F. Tiampo & S. Gross, in Geocomplexity and the Physics of Earthquakes, ed. J. B. Rundle, D. L. Turcotte and W. Klein, American Geophysical Union Monograph 120, Washington, DC, 127-146, 2000.
11. S. Peyrat, K.B. Olsen, and R. Madariaga, Dynamic modeling of the 1992 Landers earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., in press, 2001.
12. K. Olsen, Site amplification in the Los Angeles Basin from three-dimensional modeling of ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90, S77-S94, 2000.
13. http://www.relm.org/
14. Sanders, M., and P. Crotwell, FISSURES Framework for the IRIS Consortium, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology, Washington, D.C., January, 2001.
15. Report of SCEC/PEER Working Group on Validation of 3D Wave Propagation Codes, in preparation, 2001.
16. B.L. Humphreys and D.A Lindberg. The Unified Medical Language System project: a distributed experiment in improving access to biomedical information. Medinfo, 1992;7(Pt 2):1496-500.
17. McCray A.T. Representing biomedical knowledge in the UMLS semantic network. In: Broering NC, editor. High-performance medical libraries: advances in information management for the virtual era. Westport (CT): Meckler; 1993. p. 31-44.
18. Gene Ontology (GO) Consortium. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics, 25:25-29. 2000.
19. Lenat, D. B. Cyc: A Large-Scale Investment in Knowledge Infrastructure. Communications of the ACM, 38, no. 11, November 1995.
20. R. Fikes, A. Farquhar; Large-Scale Repositories of Highly Expressive Reusable Knowledge; IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 14, No. 2, March/April 1999.
21. N. Guarino. Formal Ontology, Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. International Journal of Human and Computer Studies, special issue on The Role of Formal Ontology in the Information Technology, Vol 43 no. 5/6, 1995.
22. Gruber, T. R Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5,6): 907-928, 1995.
23. Moriarty, D. Determining effective military decisive points through knowledge-rich case-based reasoning. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems. Springer Verlag. 2000.
24. Chalupsky, H.; Gil, Y.; Knoblock, C.; Lerman, K.; Oh, J.; Pynadath, D.; Russ, T.; and Tambe, M. Electric Elves: Applying agent technology to support human organizations. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (IAAI-01). Menlo Park: AAAI Press. To appear. 2001.
25. Chalupsky, H. OntoMorph: a translation system for symbolic knowledge. In Cohn, A.; Giunchiglia, F.; and Selman, B., eds., Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference (KR2000). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.
26. Information Processing--SGML Applications--Topic Navigation Maps, ISO/IEC FCD 13250, 1999.
27. McGuinness, D., and Wright, J.. An industrial-strength description logic-based configurator platform. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(4): 69-77, 1998.
28. Sabin, D., and Weigel,. Product configuration frameworks -- a survey. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(4): 42-49, 1998.
29. I. Foster & C. Kesselman, The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 677 pp., 1999.
30. I. Foster, C. Kesselman & S. Tuecke, The Anatomy of the Grid: Enabling Scalable Virtual Organizations, International Journal of Supercomputer Applications, to appear.
31. I. Foster, C. Kesselman, et al., Design and Deployment of a National-Scale Authentication, Computer, IEEE, 33(12):60-66 2000.
32. I. Foster, C. Kesselman, G. Tsudik, S. Tuecke, A Security Architecture for Computational Grids, Proc. 5th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security Conference, pg. 83-92, 1998.
33. S. Fitzgerald, I. Foster, C. Kesselman, G. von Laszewski, W. Smith, S. Tuecke A Directory Service for Configuring High-Performance Distributed Computation,, Proc. 6th IEEE Symp. on High-Performance Distributed Computing, pg. 365-375, 1997.
34. K. Czajkowski I. Foster, N. Karonis, C. Kesselman, S. Martin, W. Smith, S. Tuecke, A Resource Management Architecture for Metacomputing Systems,. Proc. IPPS/SPDP '98 Workshop on Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing, 1998.
35. W. Allcock, A. Chervenak, I. Foster, C. Kesselman, C. Salisbury, S. Tuecke, The Data Grid: Towards an Architecture for the Distributed Management and Analysis of Large Scientific Datasets, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, to appear.
36. I. Foster, A. Roy, V. Sander, L. Winkler , End-to-End Quality of Service for High-End Applications, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications Special Issue on QoS in the Internet, 1999.
37. I. Foster, C. Kesselman , The Globus Project: A Status Report., Proc. IPPS/SPDP '98 Heterogeneous Computing Workshop, pg. 4-18, 1998.
38. S. Smallen, W. Cirne, J. Frey, F. Berman, R. Wolski, M. Su, C. Kesselman, S. Young, Combining Workstations and Supercomputers to Support Grid Applications: The Parallel Tomography Experience, Proc. 9th Heterogeneous Computing Workshop, to appear.
39. K. Czajkowski, I. Foster, C. Kesselman, Resource Co-allocation in Computational Grids, Proc. of the 8th IEEE Symp. on High Performance Distributed Computing, 1999.
40. H. Casanova, G. Obertelli, F. Berman and R. Wolski,The AppLeS Parameter Sweep Template: User-Level Middleware for the Grid, Proceedings of the Super Computing Conference (SC'2000).
41. R. Moore, C. Baru, P. Bourne, M. Ellisman, S. Karin, A. Rajasekar, S. Young, Information Based Computing, Proceedings of the Workshop on Research Directions for the Next Generation Internet, May, 1997.
42. R. Moore et al., D-Lib Magazine, Collection-Based Persistent Digital Archives, March 2000, Volume 6 Number 3 [Part 1], D-Lib Magazine, April 2000, Volume 6 Number 4 [Part 2].
43. C. Baru, Managing Very Large Scientific Data Collections, poster session, 5th International Conference on High Performance Computing HiPC'98, Dec. 17-20, 1998, Chennai, India.
44. C. Baru, R. Moore, A. Rajasekar & M. Wan, The SDSC Storage Resource Broker, Proc. CASCON'98 Conference, Nov.30-Dec.3, 1998, Toronto, Canada.
45. A. Gupta, B. Ludäscher, M. E. Martone, Knowledge-Based Integration of Neuroscience Data Sources, 12th Intl. Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM), Berlin, Germany, IEEE Computer Society, July, 2000.
46. J. Allen, J. Hendler, and A. Tate. Readings in Planning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1990.
47. D. E. Wilkins. Practical Planning: Extending the Classical AI Planning Paradigm, Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.
48. Y. Gil. Plan Representation and Reasoning with Description Logics. In The Description Logic Handbook, F. Baader, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider (Eds). Cambridge University Press. To appear.
49. D. Fensel, V. Benjamins, E. Motta, & B. Wielinga. UPML: A framework for knowledge system reuse. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on AI (IJCAI-99), 1999.
50. F. Tissot & M. Gruninger, NIST Process Specification Language. Technical Report, NIST, 1999.
51. Smith, Becker, "An ontology for constructing scheduling systems," in AAAI Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering, Stanford, CA, 1997.
52. de Barros, L. N., Hendler, J., and Benjamins, V. "Par-KAP: A Knowledge Acquisition Tool for Building Practical Planning Systems." In Proc. Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Nagoya, Japan, 1997.
53. "Advisable Planning Systems," in Advanced Planning Technology, Tate, A., ed., AAAI Press, 1996.
54. J. Blythe, J. Kim, S. Ramachandran, and Y. Gil. An Integrated Environment for Knowledge Acquisition. Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI-2001), Santa Fe, New Mexico, January 2001.
55. Y. Gil and E. Melz. Explicit Representations of Problem-Solving Strategies to Support Knowledge Acquisition. Proceedings of the Thirteen National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96), Portland, OR, August 4-8, 1996.
56. J. Kim, and Y. Gil. Acquiring Problem-Solving Knowledge from End Users: Putting Interdependency Models to the Test. Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000), Austin, TX, July 30-August 3, 2000.
57. A. Valente, T. Russ, R. MacGregor, and W. Swartout. Building, Using and Reusing an Ontology of Air Campaign Planning. IEEE Intelligent Systems, special issue on Ontologies, 14(1), January 1999.
58. J. Kim and Y. Gil. Knowledge Analysis on Process Models. To appear in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on AI (IJCAI-2001), 2001.
59. A. Lansky and L. Getoor. Practical Planning in COLLAGE. Planning and Learning: On to Real Applications: Papers from the 1994 AAAI Fall Symposium, pp. 98-104. Y. Gil and M. Veloso (Eds.). AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, 1994.
60. M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and Ian Unerwood. Deductive Composition from Astronomical Software Libraries. Technical Report, SRI International and NASA Ames Research Center, 1993.
61. F. Fisher, S. Chien, E. Lo & R. Greeley, Using Artificial Intelligence Planning to Automate SAR Image Processing for Scientific Data Analysis, Proceedings of the National Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI/IAAI-98), 1998.
62. J. Runkel, W. Birmingham & A. Balkany, Solving VT by reuse, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 1996.
63. EarthScope is an NSF initiative to employ new technologies for synoptic observation of the active tectonics and structure of the North American continent (http://www.earthscope.org).

Proposal: Table of Contents
Back to the CME Home Page