About SCEC Major Projects &
Research
Technical Resources Education &
Preparedness

SCEC CSEP Workshop on Testing External Forecasts and Predictions
Conveners: Tom Jordan (SCEC/USC), Tom Bleier (Quakefinder), Andrew Michael (USGS), and Max Werner (Princeton)
Dates: May 7-8, 2013
Location: Boardroom, Davidson Conference Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Participation: ~40 (by invitation only)

SYNOPSIS: The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP), operated by the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), provides an automated infrastructure for the blind prospective testing of earthquake forecasts. The only time-dependent forecasting procedures currently accommodated by CSEP are those that run automatically on CSEP computers and use seismicity data for updating the forecasts. To extend the range of forecasting models and CSEP testing capabilities, SCEC has undertaken a project, funded by the Department of Homeland Security, to develop a facility for registering and testing external forecasting and prediction (EFP) procedures; i.e., those run outside the extant CSEP. This facility will allow investigators to document their methods and submit forecasts and predictions for retrospective and prospective testing in accordance with collaboratory standards.

The purposes of this workshop are threefold: (a) assess community needs for CSEP-based testing of EFP procedures; (b) gather community input on the design of an EFP registration and testing system; and (c) encourage modeling groups to participate in specific experiments to test their own external forecasts and predictions.

The workshop will bring together CSEP personnel, scientists interested in conducting formal evaluations of their forecasts, scientists interested in EFP testing procedures, and agency representatives. The agenda for the two-day workshop will include session on the following topics:

  1. Status and requirements for operational earthquake forecasting (OEF)
  2. Current CSEP capabilities
  3. Review of earthquake forecasts currently under CSEP testing
  4. Reports by EFP developers on the status of forecasting/prediction experiments
  5. Requirements for EFP registration into CSEP; acceptance testing; testing against reference models
  6. Break-out group discussions of prototype EFP experiments
  7. Recommendations from break-out groups for prototype EFP experiments
  8. Standardization of EFP metadata, submission formats, and acceptance tests; model classes and reference models


TUESDAY, MAY 7, 2013
07:30-08:30 Breakfast / Registration & Check-In
08:30-08:40 Welcome and Introductions T. Jordan / B. Davis
Session 1: Overview of OEF and CSEP
Moderator: M. Blanpied; Reporter: L. Jones
08:40-08:50 OEF Status and Requirements: USGS Perspective A. Michael
08:50-09:00 OEF Status and Requirements: ICEF Perspective T. Jordan
09:00-09:20 Current CSEP Capabilities M. Werner
09:20-09:40 Assessing earthquake predictions and seismicity forecasts: You have a model. So what? J. Zechar
09:40-10:00 How CSEP Really Works M. Liukis
10:00-10:15 Break
Session 2: Status of Forecasting / Prediction Experiments
Moderator: M. Gerstenberger; Reporter: Jeanne Hardebeck
10:15-10:30 The Operationalization of UCERF3 - Implementation and Testing E. Field
10:30-10:45 A time-dependent ensemble forecast model for Canterbury, New Zealand M. Gerstenberger
10:45-11:00 Operational Earthquake Forecasting in Italy: perspectives and the role of CSEP activities W. Marzocchi
11:00-11:15 Japanese earthquake predictability experiment with multiple runs before and after the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake N. Hirata
11:15-11:30 History-dependent magnitude forecast by statistical discrimination of foreshocks Y. Ogata
11:30-11:45 The Global Test of the M8-MSc predictions of the great and significant earthquakes: 20 years of experience V. Kossobokov
11:45-12:00 CSEP forecasts on six oceanic transform fault segments M. Boettcher
12:00-13:00 Lunch
13:00-13:15 Example Prototype: Earthquake Early Warning P. Maechling
13:15-13:30 Example Prototype: Geodetic Transient Detection R. Lohman
Session 3: Status of Forecasting / Prediction Experiments (continued)
Moderator: T. Bleier; Reporter: C. Dunson
13:30-13:38 Overview of EM Forecasting T. Bleier
13:38-13:53 EM Signals coming from deep below: Sources and Expressions F. Freund
13:53-14:00 On the possible origins of Pre-seismic TIR anomalies V. Tramutoli
14:00-14:15 The QuakeFinder Earthquake Forecasting Process T. Bleier
14:15-14:30 Observations of EM precursors of earthquakes from magnetometers and EQLs J. Heraud
14:30-14:45 Temporal and spatial anomalies of seismo-ionospheric GPS TEC J. Liu
14:45-15:00 On the potential of satellite TIR surveys for a Dynamic Assessment of (short-term) Seismic Risk: some examples from the EU-FP7 PRE-EARTHQUAKES Project V. Tramutoli
15:00-15:15 Multi-parameter observations of atmospheric pre-earthquake signals and their validation M. Kafatos
15:15-15:30 Radio-Tomography Predictions, Results, Prospects and Problems D. Rekenthaler
15:30-15:45 Break
Session 4: Developing Requirements for EFP Registration Into CSEP
Moderator: A. Michael; Reporter: M. Werner
15:45-16:30 Group Discussion: CSEP Template Requirements
16:30-17:30 Break-out Group Discussions of Prototype EFP Experiments
17:30 Adjourn
18:30-21:00 Reception Dinner at The University Club
WEDNESDAY, MAY 8, 2013
07:30-08:30 Breakfast
08:30-10:30 Session 5: Recommendations for Prototype EFP Experiments
Moderator: D. Schorlemmer; Reporter: P. Maechling
Reports from Break-Out Groups
10:30-10:45 Break
10:45-12:00 Session 6: Establishing EFP Standards; Metadata, Submission Formats, and Acceptance Tests; Model Classes and Reference Models
Moderator: D. Rhoades; Reporter: M. Liukis
12:00-13:00 Lunch
13:00-14:00 Session 7: Recommendations and Wrap-Up Session
Moderators: T. Jordan, T. Bleier, A. Michael, and M. Werner
14:00 Adjourn

This workshop will be followed by the SCEC CSEP Technical Planning Meeting: Priorities, Technical Implementation and Next Steps on May 8-9, 2013.


PARTICIPANTS
Jeffrey O. Adjei, DHS Science and Technology Directorate
Harley Benz, USGS
Michael Blanpied, USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
Thomas Bleier, QuakeFinder
Margaret Boettcher, New Hampshire
Robert Dahlgren, SETI Institute
Bruce Davis, DHS
Clark Dunson, QuakeFinder
Karen Felzer, USGS
Ned Field, USGS
Friedemann Freund, SETI / SJSU / NASA Ames Research Center
Matt Gerstenberger, GNS Science
Jeanne Hardebeck, USGS
Ruth Harris, USGS
Jorge Heraud, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru
Naoshi Hirata, ERI, the University of Tokyo
Tran Huynh, USC / SCEC
Dave Jackson, UCLA
Lucile Jones, USGS
Thomas Jordan, USC / SCEC
Menas Kafatos, CEESMO, Chapman University
Vladimir Kossobokov, Russian Academy of Sciences
Jann-Yenq (Tiger) Liu, National Central University, Taiwan
Masha Liukis, SCEC
Rowena Lohman, Cornell
Jeffrey Love, USGS
Philip Maechling, SCEC
Warner Marzocchi, INGV Rome
John McRaney, USC / SCEC
Andy Michael, USGS
Kevin Milner, USC / SCEC
Yosi Ogata, ISM / U Tokyo
Doug Rekenthaler, Radio-Hydro-Physics LLC & Earthquake Warnings, Inc.
David Rhoades, GNS Science
Danijel Schorlemmer, GFZ Potsdam
Valerio Tramutoli, University of Basilicata
Terry Tullis, Brown
Max Werner, Princeton
John Yu, USC / SCEC
Jeremy Zechar, ETH Zurich




Created in the SCEC system
© 2013 Southern California Earthquake Center @
Privacy Policy and Accessibility Policy