Exciting news! We're transitioning to the Statewide California Earthquake Center. Our new website is under construction, but we'll continue using this website for SCEC business in the meantime. We're also archiving the Southern Center site to preserve its rich history. A new and improved platform is coming soon!

Poster #218, Ground Motions

Refinements of UCSB Method Using a Double-Corner Frequency Source Spectrum

Chen Ji, & Ralph J. Archuleta
Poster Image: 

Poster Presentation

2020 SCEC Annual Meeting, Poster #218, SCEC Contribution #10645 VIEW PDF
A realistic spectral model of the general f^(-2) high-frequency and M_0 low-frequency asymptotes needs an intermediate f^(-1) branch (Brune, 1970). We introduced two such double-corner source spectral models JA19 and JA19_2S for 3.3≤ M ≤7.3, constrained by stochastic modeling the mean PGA and mean PGV of the NGA West-2 database. JA19 is self-similar. Its two corner frequencies f_c1 and f_c2 scale with moment magnitude (M) as (1) 〖log⁡(f〗_c1 (M))=1.754-0.5M and (2) 〖log⁡(f〗_c2 (M))=3.250-0.5M. We find that relation (1) is consistent with the known self-similar scaling relations of the rupture duration (T_d), where T_d=1⁄((πf_c1)). Relation (2) may reflect scaling relation of the average rise... time (T_R), where T_R~0.8⁄((f_c2)). Stochastic simulations using JA19 cannot reproduce the sharp change in magnitude dependence of PGA and PGV at M 5.3, suggesting a breakdown of self-similarity. To model this change, JA19_2S is found by perturbing the f_c1 scaling relationship in JA19. For JA19_2S: log⁡(f_c1 (M))=1.474-0.415 M for M≤5.3; log⁡(f_c1 (M))=2.375-0.585 M for M>5.3. In both models f_c2⁄f_c1 ≫1. Seismic radiated energy scales with 〖M_0〗^2 〖f_c1〗^2 f_c2. The ratio f_c2⁄f_c1 scales not only with the ratio of effective stress drop and static stress drop but also with the fault aspect ratio. To explore deviations in frequencies f_c1 and f_c2 for individual earthquakes, we use the double-corner spectrum to constrain the source realizations produced by UCSB Broadband kinematic method (Liu et al., 2006; Schmedes et al., 2013; Crempien and Archuleta, 2016). We demonstrate the fidelity of the technique by modeling the strong-motion recordings from three large earthquakes of the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence.