Seismic response to power production at the Coso Geothermal field, south-eastern CA: using operational parameters and relocated events to study anthropogenic seismicity rates and reservoir scale tectonic structure
Lia J. Lajoie, Daniel R. O'Connell, Robert J. Creed, & Emily E. BrodskyPublished 2013, SCEC Contribution #1940
The United States is increasing its dependence on renewable energies and with that has come an interest in expanding geothermal operations. Due to the proximity of many existing and potential geothermal sites to population centers and seismically active regions, it is important to understand how geothermal operations interact with local (and regional) seismicity, and to determine if seismicity rates are predictable from operational parameters (i.e. fluid injection, production, and net fluid extraction) alone. Furthermore, geothermal injection and production strategies can be improved by identifying, locating and characterizing related earthquakes within the tectonic related background seismicity. As the geothermal production related seismic source focal mechanisms, moment, and location are better characterized, important pragmatic questions (such as the improvement of injection strategies and 3-d thermohydromechanical model validation) and research issues (such as the relationship between far field seismic signals, local rheology changes, and native state reservoir stress evolution as a function of injection and production transients) can be more systematically addressed. We focus specifically on the 270 MW Coso geothermal field in south-eastern California, which is characterized by both high seismicity rates and relatively high aftershock triggering. After performing statistical de-clustering of local seismicity into background and aftershock rates, we show that the background rate (at both the Coso and Salton Sea geothermal fields) can be approximated during many time intervals at the 90% + confidence level by a linear combination of injection volume and the net extracted volume (difference between production and injection). Different magnitude ranges are sampled to determine if the response is constant with respect to magnitude. We also use relative relocations and focal mechanisms from Yang et al. (2012) to map fault planes within the Coso geothermal field. We use Bayesian S-wave picking of Coso borehole network microearthquake data and fully-nonlinear 3D hypocenter grid searches to obtain 18000+ well located hypocenters in the geothermal field. Coso geothermal seismicity is not diffuse; 87% of all the Coso geothermal hypocenters from 1996-2008 occur within 25 m of planes consistent with tectonic processes along the eastern California shear zone. 83% of the hypocenters associate with vertical and steeply-dipping conjugate N-NW dextral and NE sinistral strike slip planes, 12% of the earthquakes on normal-slip planes with dips of 35-70 degrees, and 5% of the events with reverse-oblique-slip on steeply-dipping planes. The non-diffuse nature of seismicity suggests that induced events occur preferentially on pre-existing structures and that flow is concentrated in fractures. With minimum horizontal stress oriented at 81 degrees, and no normal faults, in the western part of the field, and minimum horizontal stress of 106 degrees and pervasive normal faults in the eastern portion of the field (Roquemore, 1980; Blake and Davatzes, 2006), structures that are favorably oriented in the current stress field appear to be most commonly activated by geothermal operations.
Citation
Lajoie, L. J., O'Connell, D. R., Creed, R., & Brodsky, E. E. (2013). Seismic response to power production at the Coso Geothermal field, south-eastern CA: using operational parameters and relocated events to study anthropogenic seismicity rates and reservoir scale tectonic structure. Presentation at AGU Fall Meeting 2013.
