Exciting news! We're transitioning to the Statewide California Earthquake Center. Our new website is under construction, but we'll continue using this website for SCEC business in the meantime. We're also archiving the Southern Center site to preserve its rich history. A new and improved platform is coming soon!

Estimation of Ground Motion Variability in the CEUS

Sanaz Rezaeian, Xiaodan Sun, Brandon Clayton, & Stephen Hartzell

Published August 14, 2017, SCEC Contribution #7625, 2017 SCEC Annual Meeting Poster #258

The Next Generation Attenuation for Eastern U.S. (NGA-East) project (Goulet et al., 2017) has adopted the Sammon’s mapping approach for estimating ground motion uncertainties in the Central and Eastern United States (CEUS). Although this approach offers a convenient way of rendering a complex problem into a simple graphical form, the physics of the problem are obscured. We estimate the ground motion uncertainty in the CEUS by using two alternative simulation methods (Rezaeian et al., 2017): a deterministic physics-based method, and a stochastic method. Both of these methods have been previously used to simulate motions for the 2011 M 5.8 Mineral, Virginia, and the 2001 M 7.6 Bhuj, India (a tectonic analog for CEUS), earthquakes. Utilizing the NGA-East ground motion database, we model additional motions for the CEUS, and then simulate scenario M 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, and 8.0 events. To estimate the uncertainty using the physics-based method, we use several realizations for the model parameters of mechanism, slip, stress drop, rupture velocity, source depth, Q, and 1D velocity structure. Because these variations are a subset of all possible model variations, the resulting uncertainty is regarded as a lower bound estimate. The stochastic method generates ground motions using a set of 6 nonstationary parameters, describing the Arias intensity, duration, frequency and bandwidth of the motion. Each parameter is assigned a probability distribution calibrated using the CEUS database. Because a full distribution is assigned to each parameter, we regard the resulting uncertainty as an upper bound estimate. Our median amplitudes for PGA, and PSA at a variety of periods compare well with NGA-East. The variability in ground motion is examined as a function of magnitude, distance, and period. The average log-normal standard deviation from the physics-based and the stochastic methods, considered to be lower and upper bounds, are compared to NGA-East.

- Goulet, C., Y. Bozorgnia, N. Kuehn, L. Al Atik, R. Youngs, R. Graves, and G. Atkinson (2017). NGA-East Ground-Motion Models for the U.S. Geological Survey National Seismic Hazard Maps. PEER Report 2017/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research, Berkeley, CA
- Rezaeian, S., S. Hartzell, X. Sun, and C. Mendoza (2017). Simulation of Earthquake Ground Motions in the Eastern United States Using Deterministic Physics‐Based and Site‐Based Stochastic Approaches, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107, 149-168

Key Words
Ground Motion Simulation, Uncertainty, Central and Eastern U.S.

Rezaeian, S., Sun, X., Clayton, B., & Hartzell, S. (2017, 08). Estimation of Ground Motion Variability in the CEUS. Poster Presentation at 2017 SCEC Annual Meeting.

Related Projects & Working Groups
Ground Motions