2025 SCEC Shallow Earth Workshop

Explore earthquake rupture and creep in shallow earth materials and dive into technologies and strategies for studying these processes

Date: November 10-11, 2025
Location: Hilton Palm Springs, California
Workshop Organizers: William Griffith (Ohio State), Katherine Scharer (USGS), Alexis Ault (Utah State)
SCEC Award: 25246

Summary

The 2025 SCEC Workshop on Earthquake Rupture and Creep in Shallow Earth Materials brought together researchers from across the SCEC community to improve understanding of how shallow (<3 km) Earth materials influence earthquake rupture, interseismic creep, surface deformation, and strong ground motions. Because shallow on- and off-fault materials comprise the geotechnical layer that controls how seismic energy reaches Earth’s surface, how deformation is expressed, and how the geologic record of earthquakes is preserved, the workshop sought to better integrate field observations, laboratory experiments, geodesy, geophysics, earthquake engineering, and numerical modeling. The workshop began with a field trip to the Salt Creek paleoseismic site, Ferrum, and the Mecca Hills along the Southern San Andreas Fault, where participants examined seismic slip, steady and transient creep, strain localization and delocalization, and the influence of fault geometry, lithology, and shallow fault-zone structure on earthquake deformation. Invited presentations and interdisciplinary discussions then identified priorities for future observations, instrumentation, and multidisciplinary field studies needed to better characterize shallow deformation processes across California. The workshop established a shared vision for building an interdisciplinary Shallow Earth Materials (SEM) research community, strengthening collaboration among observational, experimental, engineering, and modeling disciplines, improving integration with SCEC Community Earth Models (CEMs), including the Community Velocity Model (CVM) and Community Rheology Model (CRM), and and establishing the foundation for a SCEC Technical Activity Group (TAG) proposal on Shallow Earth Materials (SEM) to coordinate future research, observations, and community engagement.

The Shallow Earth Workshop brought together researchers from complementary observational, experimental, engineering, and modeling disciplines to develop a shared understanding of shallow Earth materials and their role in earthquake rupture, fault creep, and strong ground motions. The workshop established a common scientific framework that provided the foundation for the subsequent Shallow Earth Materials (SEM) Technical Activity Group proposal. SEE PHOTOS

Key Outcomes

The workshop produced several important scientific and community outcomes that will guide future research on earthquake rupture, fault creep, and the role of shallow Earth materials in earthquake deformation and ground motions. Highlights are summarized below, with additional detail available in the workshop report.

  1. A shared vision for studying shallow Earth materials across disciplines: A principal outcome of the workshop was broad community consensus on the need to build an interdisciplinary research ecosystem focused on shallow (<3 km) Earth materials. Participants recognized that understanding shallow deformation and ground motion requires closer integration of field observations, laboratory experiments, geodesy, geophysics, geochemistry, earthquake engineering, and numerical modeling. The workshop established a shared scientific framework for studying how shallow materials influence earthquake rupture, creep, and seismic site response across the earthquake cycle, while recognizing their foundational role in strengthening SCEC Community Earth Models (CEMs) and improving earthquake and seismic hazard models.
  2. Priorities for future observations and monitoring: Participants identified several high-priority scientific questions requiring coordinated future observations, including the depth extent of fault creep, the role of lithology and fluids in controlling deformation, and the relationship between localized and distributed strain. Discussions highlighted the need for sustained monitoring infrastructure, improved characterization of shallow material properties, and expanded use of emerging technologies such as distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), optical image correlation, LiDAR, and other high-resolution geodetic and geophysical observations. The workshop also emphasized preserving and expanding long-term observational capabilities, including creepmeter networks, as essential community infrastructure.
  3. Bridging earthquake science and engineering: The workshop identified important opportunities to strengthen collaboration between earthquake scientists and geotechnical engineers by connecting fault-zone observations with site response analyses and ground motion modeling. Participants emphasized that many complementary datasets already exist but are difficult to integrate because of differences in terminology, measurement scales, and modeling approaches. Developing a shared scientific vocabulary, interoperable datasets, and common frameworks for incorporating shallow Earth properties into earthquake simulations was identified as a critical step toward reducing uncertainties in seismic hazard assessments.
  4. Building a collaborative Shallow Earth Materials community: The workshop brought together 37 participants, including 21 early-career scientists, for a field trip, invited presentations, and moderated discussions spanning the full spectrum of SCEC disciplines. The combination of field observations along the Southern San Andreas Fault and interdisciplinary scientific discussions created a common understanding of shallow deformation processes while fostering new collaborations among geologists, geodesists, laboratory scientists, engineers, and modelers. Post-workshop survey responses were overwhelmingly positive, with equal appreciation expressed for both the field trip and scientific discussions, and all respondents indicated interest in continued collaboration through future workshops, white papers, or community activities.
  5. Establishing a roadmap for future community activities: The workshop concluded with concrete recommendations for sustaining collaboration beyond the meeting. Participants identified training opportunities, and integration with SCEC Community Earth Models (CEMs), including the Community Velocity Model (CVM) and Community Rheology Model (CRM), as priorities for future work. These discussions established the foundation for the subsequent SCEC Technical Activity Group (TAG) proposal on Shallow Earth Materials, which seeks to coordinate future research, observations, workforce development, and community engagement.

References

Griffith, W. A., Scharer, K. M., & Ault, A. K. (2026). Workshop Report: Earthquake Rupture and Creep in Shallow Earth Materials, Statewide California Earthquake Center. SCEC Contribution 15056

November 10, 2025

Field Trip to Salt Creek, Ferrum and Mecca Hills
Leaders: Alexis Ault (Utah State), Tom Rockwell (SDSU), Ashley Griffith (Ohio State)

The field trip focused on outcrops along the Southern San Andreas Fault system that exhibit seismic slip, steady and triggered creep, damage signatures indicative of strain partitioning across the earthquake cycle, and strain localization and delocalization observed in geodetic measurements of steady and transient creep. Participants explored fault localization and delocalization as a function of fault geometry, lithology and sedimentology, fabric development, and depth, as well as the role of different fault zone components in shallow seismic rupture propagation versus transient creep. Discussions compared geologic, geomorphic, geophysical, mechanical, and geodetic observations of deformation at these sites, highlighting the complementarities and differences among these datasets. The field trip focused on well-studied sites in southern California that provide exceptional geologic exposure and served as the foundation for the second day of the workshop, where these observations were extended to related problems and future research priorities across California. VIEW MAP

All times are Pacific Standard Time (UTC-8). 

TimeActivityPresenter(s)
06:30 – 07:15Breakfast
07:15 – 07:30Gather in Hilton Lobby, pick up lunch
07:30 – 08:45

Depart, travel to Salt Creek, stop 1 at 33.445053, -115.842545

08:45 – 09:00Welcome and overviewAshley Griffith, Kate Scharer, Alexis Ault and Tom Rockwell
09:00 – 11:00Stop 1: (a) Salt Creek paleoseismic site and (b) creepmeterKate Scharer and Tom Rockwell
11:00 – 11:15Transition to Ferrum site, stop 2 at 33.455325, -115.855407
11:15 – 12:45

Stop 2: SSAF exposed at Ferrum

Lunch at the outcrop, 12:00

Ashley Griffith and Tom Rockwell
12:45 – 13:15Transport to Painted Canyon, Mecca Hills, stop 3 at 33.605243, -116.022468
13:15 – 16:15Stop 3: SSAF at Painted CanyonAlexis Ault, Alex DiMonte, Brady Cox
16:15Transport to Hilton
17:30Arrive back at Hilton

November 11, 2025: Science Workshop

Presentation slides may be viewed by clicking the links below. PLEASE NOTE: Files are the author’s property. They may contain unpublished or preliminary information and should only be used for reviewing the talk. Only the presentations for which SCEC has received permission to post publicly are included below.

TimeAgenda ItemSpeaker
08:00 - 08:15IntroductionAshley Griffith, Alexis Ault
08:15 - 10:15Session 1: Geodetic observations of rupture and creep – spatio-temporal scales of deformation & data gaps
08:15 - 08:45Creepy dynamics in the Salton Trough: initiation, propagation, and sequences of aseismic rupture (PDF)Kathryn Materna (CU Boulder)
08:45 - 09:15Imaging earthquakes from optical remote sensing brings constraints on deformation localization and the related shallow slip deficit (PDF)Solene Antoine (Caltech)
09:15 - 09:45Impacts of Variable Hydrothermal Alteration on Coseismic Surface Slip during the 2019 Ridgecrest EarthquakesZachary Smith (UC Berkeley)
09:45 - 10:15Discussion
10:15 - 10:30Break
10:30 - 12:00Session 2: Shallow geologic processes in response to rupture and creep
10:30 - 11:00Geodetically observed shallow deformation, geologically explained: frictional behavior of southern San Andreas fault gougeAlex DiMonte (Utah State)
11:00 - 11:30Memory, jamming, and multi-step yielding in near-surface fault zone sedimentsVashan Wright (UCSD)
11:30 - 12:00Discussion
12:00 - 13:15Lunch
13:15 - 14:30Session 3: Properties of the geotechnical layer that affect surface deformation and ground motions
13:15 - 13:45How geotechnical layers affect surface deformation and ground motions: Insights from dynamic earthquake simulations (PDF)Yihe Huang (U. Michigan)
13:45 - 14:15Field and Data Processing Methods for Developing Shear Modulus and Damping Properties Needed to Model Near-Surface Site Effects in Design Ground Motions (PDF)Brady Cox (Utah State)
14:15 - 14:30Discussion
14:30 - 14:45Break
14:45 - 17:00Session 4: Observations, technologies, and target field areas in the statewide center
14:45 - 15:15Lessons from global strike-slip surface ruptures for California's next big earthquake (PDF)Alba Rodriguez Padilla (Utah State)
15:15 - 15:45A novel Bayesian near-surface geophysics approach to characterize bedrock fracture density and their control on bedrock weathering in sedimentary ridge-valley systems in California (PDF)Mong-Han Huang (U. Maryland)
15:45 - 16:30Brainstorming Session: next steps and future observationsAshley Griffith, Alexis Ault
16:30 - 17:00Group discussion, synthesis, closing remarks

Participants

The workshop brought together 37 participants, including 21 early-career scientists, engaged in geological, geophysical, geodetic, geotechnical, and numerical investigations of near-surface fault zone deformation. Participants contributed expertise in earthquake geology, paleoseismology, geodesy, geophysics, geochemistry, rock mechanics, earthquake engineering, and numerical modeling.

Last NameFirst NameOrganization
AntoineSoleneCaltech
AultAlexisUtah State
Contreras AlvarezNormaUCR
CoxBradyUtah State
DasentJhardelUCSD
DiMonteAlexandraUtah State
DorOryIndependent
DuNairongUW- Madison
EvansEileenCSU Northridge
FunningGarethUCR
GabrielAliceUCSD
GarciaIgnacioCICESE
GarciaLeslieUtah State
GriffithAshleyOhio State
HeatonThomasCaltech
HofstetterCelesteUCR
HoltWilliamStony Brook
HuangMong-HanMaryland
HuangYiheMichigan
HuynhTranUSC-SCEC
IdzakovichMatthewOhio State
KangZhenyuOklahoma
Kindred WeigandtCajeUSC
KwagalakweAsenathCSU Northridge
LinLi-ChiehUCR
LozosJulianCSUN
MarcusSamuelUW- Madison
MaternaKathrynU Colorado
OglesbyDavidUCR
RockwellThomasSDSU
Rodriguez PadillaAlbaUtah State
SalinasMatthewUSC
SmithZacharyUC Berkeley
VashishthaMradulaStony Brook
WaechMaisyBrown
WangYuhanStanford /ETHZ
WrightVashanUCSD/Scripps
ElbannaAhmedUSC

Registration and Travel Support

The workshop registration fee was $170, which covered breakfasts, lunches, and the full-day field excursion during the two-day workshop (November 10–11). Participants were responsible for transportation to and from the Hilton Palm Springs, lodging, and dinners not included in the workshop program. SCEC provided additional travel support to 31 workshop participants, helping offset registration and travel expenses and supporting participation by researchers from a broad range of institutions and career stages. Priority for travel support was given to students, early-career researchers, and participants without institutional funding.

SCEC Activities Code of Conduct

The Statewide California Earthquake Center (SCEC) fosters a diverse and inclusive community where everyone feels safe, productive, and welcome. We expect all participants in SCEC-supported events to uphold this commitment by adhering to the SCEC Activities Code of Conduct.

SCEC Meetings and Workshops

The SCEC Annual Meeting brings together 400-500 participants worldwide to share breakthroughs, assess progress, and chart a collaborative path for earthquake science. All of the Center activities are presented, analyzed, and woven into a set of priorities for SCEC to pursue in the future.

Coming Soon!

Questions? Contact us.

Applications are currently closed

Questions? Contact us.