Exciting news! We're transitioning to the Statewide California Earthquake Center. Our new website is under construction, but we'll continue using this website for SCEC business in the meantime. We're also archiving the Southern Center site to preserve its rich history. A new and improved platform is coming soon!

Conducting 1D site response analyses to capture 2D Vs spatial variability effects

Renmin Pretell, Katerina Ziotopoulou, & Norman A. Abrahamson

Published January 27, 2022, SCEC Contribution #13361

One-dimensional site response analyses (1D SRAs) with shear-wave velocity (Vs) randomization are commonly performed to estimate median site-specific amplification factors (AFs) under the implicit assumption that this approach yields a realistic response. In this work, an investigation is conducted to determine the appropriate amount of Vs randomization (sigma_lnVs) needed to capture a median response that accounts for 2D Vs spatial variability effects. Results from 2D SRAs and 1D SRAs with Vs randomization show that the median 2D seismic responses are generally higher than 1D responses at the site’s fundamental frequency, and that higher Vs variability has a mild impact on the median 2D seismic response amplitude at the fundamental frequency, whereas it significantly reduces the median 1D response. Findings indicate that the 84th percentile AFs based on 1D SRAs conducted with Vs randomization using sigma_lnVs = 0.25, approximate well with the more realistic median 2D SRA-based AFs around the fundamental frequency, while the 70th to 60th percentiles might be more appropriate at higher frequencies. The benefit of using percentiles of the 1D SRA-based AFs higher than the median is shown for different site conditions and supported by comparisons against empirical data from four downhole sites.

Key Words
Vs randomization, 2D and 1D site response analyses, shear wave velocity, spatial variability, random fields

Pretell, R., Ziotopoulou, K., & Abrahamson, N. A. (2022). Conducting 1D site response analyses to capture 2D Vs spatial variability effects. Earthquake Spectra, 38(3), 2235–2259. doi: 10.1177/87552930211069400. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/87552930211069400