Exciting news! We're transitioning to the Statewide California Earthquake Center. Our new website is under construction, but we'll continue using this website for SCEC business in the meantime. We're also archiving the Southern Center site to preserve its rich history. A new and improved platform is coming soon!

Quantifying the coalescence process of microcracks leading to a system-size failure

Ilya Zaliapin, & Yehuda Ben-Zion

Published August 15, 2017, SCEC Contribution #7830, 2017 SCEC Annual Meeting Poster #187 (PDF)

Poster Image: 
We analyze Acoustic Emission (AE) data with the goal of quantifying the transition from distributed events to a system-size failure. Several data sets from different experiments provide information on the failure process in different rock types (granite, sandstone), loading conditions (constant loading rate vs. servo-controlled to maintain about constant AE rate) and sample properties (pre-existing notch vs. intact sample). Each data set is considered a realization of a coalescence process where earlier failures tend to merge with later ones. The merging of two existing failures can only occur via a new failure that connects the two. Healing is ignored and a global coalescence failure structure progressively grows in size by merging with other failures. Mergers (failures that unify earlier failures) are defined as the nearest-neighbors of the coalescing events with respect to a given space-time-magnitude distance. A catalog of AE events is represented with this simplified framework by a time-oriented tree, whose vertices are the catalog events with the root in the last event. The number Z(t) of unmerged events at time t is a useful statistic for describing the coalescence dynamics. Preliminary results suggest the existence of four quantitatively defined stages of the failure process. Stage I – accumulation of distributed and largely uncorrelated events corresponding to a steady increase of Z(t). Stage II – approximately equal generation of new events and mergers corresponding to steady-state Z(t) with small fluctuations. Stage III – transition to an instability-prone state corresponding to strong fluctuations of Z(t). Stage IV – abrupt drop of Z(t) leading to a system-size failure. The stages durations differ by orders of magnitude, with stages I and IV being the longest and shortest, respectively. However, the distributions of seismic moment, Benioff strain, and event number are comparable (differ by 10-20%) among the four stages. The event and coalescence rates exponentially increase prior to the system-size failure (during Stages I-III). Updated results will be presented in the meeting.

Key Words
acoustic emission, coalescence

Citation
Zaliapin, I., & Ben-Zion, Y. (2017, 08). Quantifying the coalescence process of microcracks leading to a system-size failure. Poster Presentation at 2017 SCEC Annual Meeting.


Related Projects & Working Groups
Fault and Rupture Mechanics (FARM)