2026 SCEC Dynamic Rupture Workshop

Introducing the new ShakeOut Scenario 2.0 aftershock benchmark exercise for community verification of dynamic rupture codes

Date: October 14, 2026
Location: Online via Zoom
Workshop Organizers: Ruth Harris (USGS), Michael Barall (USGS)
SCEC Award: 26059

Summary

The ShakeOut Scenario 2.0 is a collaborative effort to generate updated earthquake scenarios that build upon the influential 2008 ShakeOut Scenario using current scientific understanding and engineering capabilities to evaluate earthquake impacts under today’s built environment, infrastructure systems, and societal conditions. The simulated ShakeOut Scenario 2.0 mainshock is a dynamically propagating large earthquake rupturing the southern San Andreas fault in California. Working within SCEC’s ShakeOut Scenario Technical Activity Group (TAG), the Statewide California Earthquake Center – U.S. Geological Survey (SCEC-USGS) dynamic rupture group is modeling a scenario large aftershock occurring in the weeks following the mainshock in a region of calculated increased static stress generated by the mainshock. The scenario large aftershock will be an M6.7-6.9 on the Raymond-Hollywood faults in the densely populated Los Angeles Basin. The scenario will be used by members of the engineering and earthquake effects teams to investigate its impact on the built and human environment in the Los Angeles Basin and beyond. 

Dynamic rupture codes simulate how earthquake ruptures evolve from specified fault geometry, rock, stress, and friction conditions. Benchmark exercises test whether independently developed codes produce consistent results under the same assumptions—an essential step in confirming that the codes are working as intended before the models can be validated against observations. The SCEC-USGS dynamic rupture group is using this scenario aftershock as a benchmark exercise to test if multiple codes can produce the same earthquake source and near-field ground motion results when incorporating the 3D fault geometry adapted from the SCEC Community Fault Model (CFM), 3D velocity and density structure from the SCEC Community Velocity Model (CVM) truncated at the lowest velocities, along with slip-weakening friction, and initial stress conditions informed by the SCEC Community Stress Model (CSM).

At this workshop we will introduce the aftershock-scenario benchmark exercise, and discuss the latest findings from dynamic rupture simulations and related projects. Presentations and discussions will explain the benchmark’s scientific basis, prescribed model inputs, and participation process; invite additional modeling groups to contribute results from their own codes; and provide a forum for sharing new scientific ideas and related community projects. The workshop will conclude by reviewing what was learned and identifying next steps for the community verification effort.

Participation

The workshop is open to researchers, model developers, students, and others interested in dynamic rupture simulation, earthquake-source physics, code verification, and near-field ground motions. Modelers interested in participating in the new ShakeOut Scenario 2.0 aftershock benchmark exercise are especially encouraged to attend.

To participate, complete the online registration form by October 7. Registrants may also propose a one-slide, 100-second lightning talk through the form. There is no registration fee, and the Zoom link will be provided with the registration confirmation.

October 14, 2026

Presentation materials may be viewed by clicking the links below. PLEASE NOTE: Files are the author’s property. They may contain unpublished or preliminary information and should only be used for reviewing the talk. Only the presentations for which SCEC has received permission to post publicly are included below.

All times are Pacific Daylight Time (UTC-7). 

TimeAgenda ItemSpeaker
09:00 - 09:15

Introductions & Workshop Goals

Ruth Harris
09:20 - 10:30

Session 1: The ShakeOut Scenario 2.0

Presentations will introduce the broader ShakeOut Scenario 2.0 effort and the scientific context for its mainshock and aftershock scenarios, setting the stage for the new dynamic rupture benchmark exercise.

09:20 - 09:55
  • Overview of the Scenario 
Kate Scharer
09:55 - 10:15
  • Mainshock dynamic rupture & ground motions simulations
Chunhui Zhao
10:15 - 10:30Discussion
10:30 - 10:45Break
10:45 - 11:45

Session 2: The Benchmark Exercise Description

This session will introduce the technical specifications for the ShakeOut Scenario 2.0 aftershock benchmark, including its fault geometry, material structure, friction, initial stress conditions, and requested outputs. Community discussion will clarify the exercise and how modeling groups can participate.

10:45 - 11:25
  • The ShakeOut Scenario 2.0 aftershock benchmark exercise
Michael Barall
11:25 - 11:45Discussion
11:45 - 12:45

Session 3: Lightning Talks on New Science Ideas

Participants will share emerging research, methods, questions, and project ideas related to dynamic rupture simulation, earthquake-source physics, code verification, and near-field ground motions through one-slide, 100-second presentations.

  1. Abdullah Imran - Anelastic Attenuation in Dynamic Rupture
  2. Fabian Kutschera - Seismic-acoustic-gravity signals in fully coupled simulations (Paper)
  3. David Schneller - Towards sub-cell material and velocity model resolution in SeisSol
  4. Evan Marschall - Linking On-Fault Rupture Dynamics to Off-Fault Deformation in 3D Dynamic Rupture Simulations of the Covote Mountains Segment of the Elsinore Fault Zone, California
  5. Dunyu Liu - Earthquake rupture dynamics from Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) (Paper)
  6. Adam Margolis - Quantifying the Effects of the Value of Absolute Friction and Geometrical Symmetry on Dip-Slip Faults (Paper)
12:45 - 13:15Break
13:15 - 14:30

Session 4:  Related Projects

Presentations will highlight related projects and emerging scientific ideas and methodologies that may open opportunities for future community research.

13:15 - 13:25
  • SCEC Advancing Simulations of Sequences of Earthquakes and Aseismic Slip (SEAS) Technical Activity Group
Mohamed Abdelmeguid
13:25 - 13:35
  • CRESCENT Dynamic Rupture, Earthquake Cycle, and Tsunamis (DET) Working Group
Wenqiang Zhang
13:35 - 13:45
  • SCEC Community Stress Drop Validation Technical Activity Group
Rachel Abercrombie / Annemarie Baltay
13:45 - 13:55
  • SCEC Lab Friction Comparison Exercise
Tamara Jeppson
13:55 - 14:30Discussion
14:30 - 15:00Break
15:00 - 16:00

Session 5: More Lightning Talks on New Science Ideas

A second series of one-slide, 100-second lightning talks will continue the rapid exchange of new findings, methods, and community projects related to dynamic rupture science and simulation.

  1. Karen Luttrell - The questions people ask me most about stress...
  2. Yuko Kase - Slip-weakening and rate-strengthening friction law for shallow layer above the seismogenic zone (Paper)
  3. Alice Gabriel - On the Predictability of Slip, Rupture Geometry, and Speed of the 2025 Mw7.8 Mandalay, Myanmar, Earthquake (Paper)
  4. Dunyu Liu - DR4GM: Dynamic Rupture for Ground Motion (GitHub repo) 
  5. Brad Aagaard - Consistent slip rake angles for complex, nonplanar fault geometry
  6. Elizabeth Madden - Earthquakes on the Concord-Green Valley-Berryessa fault
16:00 - 16:30

Session 6: Workshop Recap

Group discussion will synthesize the day’s presentations, review questions arising from the benchmark exercise, and identify next steps for model participation and the broader community verification effort.

16:30Workshop Adjourns

SCEC-USGS Dynamic Rupture Verification Group

This SCEC-USGS group is an international collaboration that focuses on verifying computer codes used to simulate earthquakes as spontaneous dynamic ruptures. While the ultimate goal is model validation, we are currently using benchmarks to test for consistency of results under the same assumptions.

LEARN MORE

Participants

Last NameFirst NameOrganization
AagaardBradUS Geological Survey
AbdelmeguidMohamedUniversity of Houston
AbercrombieRachelBoston University
AmpueroJean-PaulGEOAZUR - IRD
AntoineSoleneUniversity of Southern California
BaltayAnnemarieUS Geological Survey
BarallMichaelUS Geological Survey
BarberyMonicaUniversity of Utah
BotellBrittanyUniversity of Memphis
BoydOliverUS Geological Survey
CallaghanScottSCEC/USC
ChiamaKristenSCEC/USC
ContrerasLilibethInstituto de Ingeniería, UNAM
DengDiThe Chinese University of Hong Kong
DouillyRobyUniversity of California, Riverside
DunhamEricStanford University
GabrielAliceUniversity of California, San Diego
GallovičFrantišekCharles University in Prague
GuptaAvinashUniversity of Canterbury
HarrisRuthUS Geological Survey
HearnElizabethUS Geological Survey
HirakawaEvanUS Geological Survey
HirshornBarryScripps/UCSD
HuangYiheUniversity of Michigan
HuynhTranSCEC/USC
JeppsonTamaraUS Geological Survey
KaseYukoGeological Survey of Japan
KhorramiMohammadVirginia Tech
KuranFahrettinIUSS Pavia
KutscheraFabianScripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD
KyriakopoulosChristodoulosCERI, UofMemphis
LinChen-RayUniversity of Potsdam
LiuDunyuUniversity of Texas, Institute for Geophysics
LuttrellKarenLouisiana State University
MaShuoSan Diego State University
MaddenElizabethSan José State University
MaoGuanyuThe Chinese University of Hong Kong
MargolisAdamUniversity of California, Riverside
MarschallEvanScripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD
MengesChristopherUS Geological Survey
MilnerKevinUS Geological Survey
MosconiFrancescoSapienza Università di Roma
NicholsonCraigUC Santa Barbara
OlsenKimSan Diego State University
PalgunadiKadekInsititut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
ParsonsAlexanderUniversity College London
PatelAnupamSDSU
PaukEdricSCEC/USC
RamirezErikUABC
RowshandelBadieCalifornia Earthquake Authority
ScharerKateUS Geological Survey
SchnellerDavidTechnical University of Munich
ShankerProf DayaIndian Institute of Technology Roorkee
SilvaFabioSCEC/USC
WangBinhaoUniversity of California, San Diego
WangKaiMichigan State University
WangYongfeiVerisk
WithersKyleUS Geological Survey
YangJiaoMcGill University
YoonClaraUS Geological Survey
YunJeenaUT Austin
Zambrano MartinezEdwar AlbertoUniversity of Memphis
ZhangWenqiangStanford University
ZhangZhenguoSouthern University of Science and Technology
ZhaoChunhuiSCEC/USC
ZhouJiangchengThe Chinese University of Hong Kong

SCEC Activities Code of Conduct

The Statewide California Earthquake Center (SCEC) fosters a diverse and inclusive community where everyone feels safe, productive, and welcome. We expect all participants in SCEC-supported events to uphold this commitment by adhering to the SCEC Activities Code of Conduct.

SCEC Meetings and Workshops

The SCEC Annual Meeting brings together 400-500 participants worldwide to share breakthroughs, assess progress, and chart a collaborative path for earthquake science. All of the Center activities are presented, analyzed, and woven into a set of priorities for SCEC to pursue in the future.

Coming Soon!

Questions? Contact us.

Applications are currently closed

Questions? Contact us.