Connecting earthquake science, engineering, and infrastructure needs to reduce seismic risk in the northern Walker Lane region
Date: October 20-22, 2026
Location: University of Nevada, Reno Lake Tahoe Campus
Workshop Organizers: Rich Koehler (UNR), Christie Rowe (UNR), Ben Mason (UNR)
SCEC Award: 26085
The northern Walker Lane of northeastern California and western Nevada is a region of significant earthquake hazard where major active fault systems intersect with population centers and critical water, power, and transportation infrastructure. Historic and geologic records document earthquakes approaching magnitude 7, and the 2023 U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model indicates a high probability of damaging earthquake shaking within the region over the next 50 years. Yet compared with other parts of California, many seismic sources remain poorly characterized, monitoring is relatively sparse, and substantial uncertainties persist in fault geometry and connectivity, paleoseismic parameters, seismicity, strain accumulation, site conditions, and expected ground motions.
These knowledge gaps are particularly consequential because significant water and power infrastructure lies within and adjacent to the active fault systems of the northern Walker Lane. Major dams and reservoirs, hydroelectric facilities, transportation corridors, water conveyance systems, and other lifelines are exposed to fault rupture, strong shaking, liquefaction, landsliding, and related earthquake hazards. The region also crosses the California–Nevada border, creating scientific, monitoring, infrastructure, and emergency-response challenges that require coordination across institutions and jurisdictions.
The new Sierra Earthquake Risk Reduction Technical Activity Group (SiERRa-TAG) will brought together earthquake scientists and engineers with utilities, federal and state agencies, and local stakeholders to address these interconnected challenges. The TAG effort will focus initially on the central and northern Walker Lane, strengthening connections among communities that have not historically been closely integrated within SCEC while identifying multidisciplinary research that can improve earthquake hazard and risk assessments for the region. The inaugural SiERRa-TAG workshop reviewed ongoing earthquake-hazard research, assessed the state of knowledge and key uncertainties, and identified priority studies with the greatest potential to improve regional seismic hazard estimates and support water and power resilience. Technical presentations, a field trip to active faults and critical infrastructure, and interdisciplinary working groups connected observations and models with engineering and stakeholder needs. Participants contributed to developing an actionable, multidisciplinary research plan; priorities for earthquake scenarios and associated ground-motion studies; and improved coordination for earthquake response across the northern Walker Lane.
The workshop established the scientific and collaborative foundation for SiERRa-TAG and developed coordinated priorities for reducing earthquake-risk uncertainties in the northern Walker Lane. Specific objectives included:
Presentation materials may be viewed by clicking the links below. PLEASE NOTE: Files are the author’s property. They may contain unpublished or preliminary information and should only be used for reviewing the talk. Only the presentations for which SCEC has received permission to post publicly are included below.
All times below Pacific Daylight Time (UTC-7)
| Time | Agenda Item | Presenter | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08:00 - 08:30 | Workshop Check-In with Continental Breakfast | ||
| 08:30 - 09:15 | Welcome and SiERRa-TAG Vision Introduction to the northern Walker Lane earthquake-risk challenge, SiERRa-TAG goals, and expected workshop products. | ||
| 08:30 - 08:50 |
| Rich Koehler / Ben Mason / Christie Rowe | |
| 08:50 - 09:00 |
| Ahmed Elbanna | |
| 09:00 - 09:15 |
| Rich Koehler / Ben Mason / Christie Rowe | |
| 09:15 - 10:30 | Session 1: Active Faults and Earthquake Sources Presentations and discussion reviewing active fault geometry, Quaternary faulting, paleoseismic constraints, and key uncertainties affecting characterization of earthquake sources in the central and northern Walker Lane. | 15 min talks, hold questions for community discussion | |
| 09:15 - 09:30 |
| Rich Koehler | |
| 09:30 - 09:45 |
| Chris DuRoss / Rich Briggs | |
| 09:45 - 10:00 |
| Judy Zachariasen / Gordon Seitz | |
| 10:00 - 10:30 |
| All | |
| 10:30 - 10:45 | Break | ||
| 10:45 - 12:00 | Session 2: Seismicity, Geodesy, and Regional Monitoring Presentations and discussion examining regional seismicity and deformation, monitoring capabilities, cross-border catalog inconsistencies, and opportunities to better integrate seismic and geodetic observations. | 15 min talks, hold questions for community discussion | |
| 10:45 - 11:00 |
| Kyren Bogolub | |
| 11:00 - 11:15 |
| Bill Hammond | |
| 11:15 - 11:30 |
| Taka’aki Taira | |
| 11:30 - 12:00 |
| All | |
| 12:00 - 13:00 | Lunch | ||
| 13:00 - 14:30 | Session 3: From Earthquake Hazards to Infrastructure Risk Presentations and discussion connecting seismic-source and ground-motion uncertainties with dams, transportation, water systems, lifelines, ground failure, and other engineering and emergency-management needs. | 15 min talks, hold questions for community discussion | |
| 13:00 - 13:15 |
| Don Hoirup / Chad Carlson | |
| 13:15 - 13:30 |
| Ian Pierce | |
| 13:30 - 13:45 |
| Randy Williams | |
| 13:45 - 14:00 |
| Keith Conrad | |
| 14:00 - 14:30 |
| All | |
| 14:30 - 14:45 | Break | ||
| 14:45 - 16:00 | Session 4: Ground Motions and Site Characterization Presentations and discussion examining ground-motion models, site conditions, basin effects, and data needed to improve regional and site-specific hazard assessments. | 15 min talks, hold questions for community discussion | |
| 14:45 - 15:00 |
| Ben Mason | |
| 15:00 - 15:15 |
| Greg Lavrentiadis | |
| 15:15 - 15:30 |
| Elnaz Seylabi | |
| 15:30 - 16:00 |
| All | |
| 16:00 - 16:30 | Session 5: Identifying Shared Priorities A facilitated community discussion to synthesize the day's presentations, identify the uncertainties with the greatest consequences for regional hazard and risk, and establish questions and priorities to carry into the field trip and Day 3 working groups. | ||
| 16:30 | Day 1 Adjourns | ||
On the field trip participants discussed recent mapping and paleoseismic trenching that is beginning to provide a better understanding of the style and rate of strain accommodation across the Truckee fault zone. Assessing future earthquake potential in the region is essential for reducing the exposure to seismic risk for population centers, water storage and hydroelectric facilities, as well as transportation and commerce corridors. See the Field Trip Guide by Rich D. Koehler, Ian Pierce, Randy Williams, Christie Rowe, and Ben Mason.
| Time | Agenda Item |
|---|---|
| 07:30 - 08:00 | Breakfast & Field Trip Check-In |
| 08:00 - 08:15 | Field Trip Orientation and Safety Briefing |
| 08:15 - 12:00 | Polaris and Dog Valley Faults |
| 12:00 - 13:00 | Field Lunch |
| 13:00 - 16:30 | Boca and Stampede Reservoirs |
| 16:30 | Day 2 Adjourns |
| Time | Agenda Item |
|---|---|
| 07:30 - 08:30 | Continental Breakfast |
| 08:30 - 10:00 | Lightning Talks on New Science Ideas Participants will share emerging research, methods, questions, and project ideas related to central and northern Walker Lane through 3-minute presentations (1-3 slides each).
|
| 10:00 - 10:20 | Break |
| 10:20 - 12:00 | Working Group Session 1: Priorities and Opportunities Participants assess current knowledge, identify critical gaps, and develop priority research needs. |
| 12:00 - 13:00 | Lunch |
| 13:00 - 15:00 | Working Group Session 2: Priorities, Workplan, and Next Steps Community discussion to identify cross-cutting priorities, opportunities for a multidisciplinary pilot study, earthquake-scenario needs, and areas requiring coordination across groups and organizations. Outline white paper to synthesize group discussions into concise recommendations and a SiERRa-TAG research work plan. |
| 15:00 - 15:15 | Break |
| 15:15 - 15:30 | Closing Remarks |
| 15:30 | Workshop Adjourns |
The workshop brought together 47 participants from universities, government agencies, utilities, infrastructure organizations, emergency management, and the private sector. Participants represented expertise in earthquake geology, seismology, geodesy, ground-motion and site characterization, engineering, infrastructure resilience, and emergency response.
This broad interdisciplinary participation strengthened connections among the scientific, engineering, and stakeholder communities working across California and Nevada. It supported the development of a shared understanding of the region’s earthquake-risk challenges and helped identify coordinated priorities for research, hazard assessment, infrastructure resilience, and earthquake response.
* Remote Participant
| Last Name | First Name | Organization |
|---|---|---|
| Bogolub | Kyren | Nevada Seismo Lab |
| Briggs | Rich | USGS |
| Calderon | Kristina | DWR Division of Engineering Project Geology |
| *Callaghan | Scott | USC/SCEC |
| Carlson | Chad | CA Dept of Water Resources |
| Chiama | Kristen | USC/SCEC |
| Conrad | Keith | NV Division of Water Resources |
| Dadzoe | Florence | University of Massachusetts Amherst |
| Dawson | Timothy | CGS |
| Dee | Seth | Independent Consultant |
| Duan | Benchun | Texas A&M University |
| Dunbar | Sean | CA DWR |
| DuRoss | Chris | USGS |
| Elbanna | Ahmed | USC/SCEC |
| Fernandez | Carlos | UNR |
| Ford | Heather | UC Riverside |
| *Garcia | Diana | BGC Engineering |
| Greene | Todd | CSU Chico |
| Gross | Maya | NV Bureau of Mines and Geology, UNR |
| Hammond | Bill | UNR |
| *Hatem | Alex | USGS |
| Hoirup | Don | CA Dept Water Resources (retired) |
| Huynh | Tran | SCEC/USC |
| Kent | Graham | Nevada Seismo Lab |
| Koehler | Rich | NV Bureau of Mines and Geology, UNR |
| Kreemer | Corné | UNR |
| Lavrentiadis | Grigorios | University at Buffalo |
| Louie | John | Ter_an, Inc. |
| *Madugo | Christopher | PG&E |
| Marino | Dana | UNR / NSL |
| Mason | Ben | UNR |
| Motter | Sirena | UNR |
| Oskin | Michael | UC Davis |
| Pierce | Ian | PG&E |
| Quezada | Kylie | CSU Chico/PG&E |
| *Reitman | Nadine | USGS |
| Rosinski | Anne | FEMA Region 9 |
| Rowe | Christie | Nevada Seismo Lab |
| Rutherford | Ryan | UNR |
| Savran | William | Nevada Seismo Lab |
| Seylabi | Elnaz | UNR |
| Smith | Ken | UNR/NNSS |
| *Taira | Taka'aki | Berkeley Seismo Lab |
| Trexler | Charles | USGS ESC |
| Williams | Randy | U.S. Bureau of Reclamation |
| Yoon | Clara | USGS |
| Zachariasen | Judy | CGS |
The workshop was planned for approximately 40 in-person participants, selected through an application process based on their interests and potential contributions to the workshop objectives. Participants were expected to attend the full workshop and contribute to related activities and deliverables. Most arrived on October 19 and departed after the workshop concluded on October 22.
SCEC provided on-site lodging, meals, and complimentary group transportation between Reno-Tahoe International Airport (RNO) and the University of Nevada, Reno at Lake Tahoe campus. Participants were responsible for arranging and funding their travel to and from the Reno–Lake Tahoe area. RNO, approximately 30 miles from the campus in Incline Village, is the closest commercial airport.
The Statewide California Earthquake Center (SCEC) fosters a diverse and inclusive community where everyone feels safe, productive, and welcome. We expect all participants in SCEC-supported events to uphold this commitment by adhering to the SCEC Activities Code of Conduct.
The SCEC Annual Meeting brings together 400-500 participants worldwide to share breakthroughs, assess progress, and chart a collaborative path for earthquake science. All of the Center activities are presented, analyzed, and woven into a set of priorities for SCEC to pursue in the future.