2026 SCEC SiERRa Workshop

Connecting earthquake science, engineering, and infrastructure needs to reduce seismic risk in the northern Walker Lane region

Date: October 20-22, 2026
Location: University of Nevada, Reno Lake Tahoe Campus
Workshop Organizers: Rich Koehler (UNR), Christie Rowe (UNR), Ben Mason (UNR)
SCEC Award: 26085

Summary

The northern Walker Lane of northeastern California and western Nevada is a region of significant earthquake hazard where major active fault systems intersect with population centers and critical water, power, and transportation infrastructure. Historic and geologic records document earthquakes approaching magnitude 7, and the 2023 U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model indicates a high probability of damaging earthquake shaking within the region over the next 50 years. Yet compared with other parts of California, many seismic sources remain poorly characterized, monitoring is relatively sparse, and substantial uncertainties persist in fault geometry and connectivity, paleoseismic parameters, seismicity, strain accumulation, site conditions, and expected ground motions.

These knowledge gaps are particularly consequential because significant water and power infrastructure lies within and adjacent to the active fault systems of the northern Walker Lane. Major dams and reservoirs, hydroelectric facilities, transportation corridors, water conveyance systems, and other lifelines are exposed to fault rupture, strong shaking, liquefaction, landsliding, and related earthquake hazards. The region also crosses the California–Nevada border, creating scientific, monitoring, infrastructure, and emergency-response challenges that require coordination across institutions and jurisdictions. 

The new Sierra Earthquake Risk Reduction Technical Activity Group (SiERRa-TAG) will brought together earthquake scientists and engineers with utilities, federal and state agencies, and local stakeholders to address these interconnected challenges. The TAG effort will focus initially on the central and northern Walker Lane, strengthening connections among communities that have not historically been closely integrated within SCEC while identifying multidisciplinary research that can improve earthquake hazard and risk assessments for the region. The inaugural SiERRa-TAG workshop reviewed ongoing earthquake-hazard research, assessed the state of knowledge and key uncertainties, and identified priority studies with the greatest potential to improve regional seismic hazard estimates and support water and power resilience. Technical presentations, a field trip to active faults and critical infrastructure, and interdisciplinary working groups connected observations and models with engineering and stakeholder needs. Participants contributed to developing an actionable, multidisciplinary research plan; priorities for earthquake scenarios and associated ground-motion studies; and improved coordination for earthquake response across the northern Walker Lane.

Workshop Goals

The workshop established the scientific and collaborative foundation for SiERRa-TAG and developed coordinated priorities for reducing earthquake-risk uncertainties in the northern Walker Lane. Specific objectives included:

  1. Assess the state of knowledge and critical data gaps. Review current understanding of active faults, paleoseismic parameters, seismicity, geodetic deformation, site conditions, ground motions, and infrastructure vulnerability, and identify uncertainties that most strongly affect regional earthquake-hazard estimates.
  2. Identify priority multidisciplinary studies. Determine where coordinated geological, geophysical, geodetic, seismological, and engineering investigations can provide the greatest advances in characterizing seismic sources, ground motions, and earthquake impacts, including candidate sites for an initial multidisciplinary pilot study.
  3. Connect hazard science with infrastructure and engineering needs. Bring together scientists, engineers, utilities, agencies, and local stakeholders to identify credible earthquake scenarios, relevant hazard products, and priority infrastructure systems for subsequent engineering and risk analyses. 
  4. Strengthen regional earthquake-response coordination. Develop relationships, communication pathways, response plans, and data-collection priorities that can improve coordinated scientific reconnaissance and cross-border response following future Walker Lane earthquakes. 
  5. Develop an actionable research agenda for SiERRa-TAG. Establish shared research priorities and a coordinated work plan that can guide future SiERRa-TAG activities, support improvements to community and national hazard models, and provide a foundation for future collaborative research proposals.

Presentation materials may be viewed by clicking the links below. PLEASE NOTE: Files are the author’s property. They may contain unpublished or preliminary information and should only be used for reviewing the talk. Only the presentations for which SCEC has received permission to post publicly are included below.

All times below Pacific Daylight Time (UTC-7)

October 20, 2026

State of Knowledge and Priority Needs
TimeAgenda ItemPresenter
08:00 - 08:30Workshop Check-In with Continental Breakfast
08:30 - 09:15

Welcome and SiERRa-TAG Vision

Introduction to the northern Walker Lane earthquake-risk challenge, SiERRa-TAG goals, and expected workshop products.

08:30 - 08:50
  • Welcome and SiERRA-TAG Vision
Rich Koehler / Ben Mason / Christie Rowe
08:50 - 09:00
  • Welcome from SCEC: Science for Infrastructure Resilience and Risk Reduction (PDF)
Ahmed Elbanna
09:00 - 09:15
  • Workshop Logistics
Rich Koehler / Ben Mason / Christie Rowe
09:15 - 10:30

Session 1: Active Faults and Earthquake Sources

Presentations and discussion reviewing active fault geometry, Quaternary faulting, paleoseismic constraints, and key uncertainties affecting characterization of earthquake sources in the central and northern Walker Lane.

15 min talks, hold questions for community discussion
09:15 - 09:30
  • The northern Walker Lane: distributed active faulting and
    paleoseismology
Rich Koehler
09:30 - 09:45
  • USGS IMW Earthquake Geology and NSHM Update
Chris DuRoss / Rich Briggs
09:45 - 10:00
  • California earthquake hazard program: Paleoseismic and zoning studies of the West Tahoe and Incline Village faults
Judy Zachariasen / Gordon Seitz
10:00 - 10:30
  • Community Discussion
All
10:30 - 10:45Break
10:45 - 12:00

Session 2: Seismicity, Geodesy, and Regional Monitoring

Presentations and discussion examining regional seismicity and deformation, monitoring capabilities, cross-border catalog inconsistencies, and opportunities to better integrate seismic and geodetic observations.

15 min talks, hold questions for community discussion
10:45 - 11:00
  • Nevada Seismic Network and the CA/NV border catalog
Kyren Bogolub
11:00 - 11:15
  • Northern Walker Lane Fault Slip Rates and Earthquakes as Seen by GNSS Networks (PDF)
Bill Hammond
11:15 - 11:30
  • Earthquake Monitoring near CA-NV Border with Northern California Seismic Network
Taka’aki Taira
11:30 - 12:00
  • Community Discussion
All
12:00 - 13:00Lunch
13:00 - 14:30

Session 3: From Earthquake Hazards to Infrastructure Risk

Presentations and discussion connecting seismic-source and ground-motion uncertainties with dams, transportation, water systems, lifelines, ground failure, and other engineering and emergency-management needs.


15 min talks, hold questions for community discussion
13:00 - 13:15
  • California DWR: Northern Walker Lane Seismic Hazards and the State Water Project, Upper Feather River, Plumas County, CA
Don Hoirup / Chad Carlson
13:15 - 13:30
  • Seismic Hazard Across PG&E's Sierra Nevada Hydro System
Ian Pierce
13:30 - 13:45
  • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation: Seismic Hazard and Reclamation Infrastructure in the Northern Walker Lane
Randy Williams
13:45 - 14:00
  • Nevada Dams and Seismic Hazards: Understanding the Risks and the Path Forward
Keith Conrad
14:00 - 14:30
  • Community Discussion
All
14:30 - 14:45Break
14:45 - 16:00

Session 4: Ground Motions and Site Characterization

Presentations and discussion examining ground-motion models, site conditions, basin effects, and data needed to improve regional and site-specific hazard assessments.

15 min talks, hold questions for community discussion
14:45 - 15:00
  • Geotechnical site reconnaissance
Ben Mason
15:00 - 15:15
  • Surface Fault Rupture Hazard: Advancing Earthquake Induced Ground Deformation Modeling (PDF)
Greg Lavrentiadis
15:15 - 15:30
  • Characterizing and Modeling the Shallow Crust for Regional Ground-Motion Simulations
Elnaz Seylabi
15:30 - 16:00
  • Community Discussion
All
16:00 - 16:30

Session 5: Identifying Shared Priorities

A facilitated community discussion to synthesize the day's presentations, identify the uncertainties with the greatest consequences for regional hazard and risk, and establish questions and priorities to carry into the field trip and Day 3 working groups.

16:30Day 1 Adjourns

October 21, 2026

Field Context — Faults, Dams, and Earthquake Risk

On the field trip participants discussed recent mapping and paleoseismic trenching that is beginning to provide a better understanding of the style and rate of strain accommodation across the Truckee fault zone. Assessing future earthquake potential in the region is essential for reducing the exposure to seismic risk for population centers, water storage and hydroelectric facilities, as well as transportation and commerce corridors. See the Field Trip Guide by Rich D. Koehler, Ian Pierce, Randy Williams, Christie Rowe, and Ben Mason.

TimeAgenda Item
07:30 - 08:00Breakfast & Field Trip Check-In
08:00 - 08:15Field Trip Orientation and Safety Briefing
08:15 - 12:00

Polaris and Dog Valley Faults
Field observations of active fault traces and previous paleoseismic study sites, with discussion of fault geometry, earthquake history, rupture behavior, and remaining data needs.

12:00 - 13:00Field Lunch
13:00 - 16:30

Boca and Stampede Reservoirs 
Visits to faults and water infrastructure to examine the intersection of earthquake hazards, dam safety, and seismic mitigation and to discuss how improved source characterization and ground-motion estimates can inform engineering and risk assessments.

16:30Day 2 Adjourns

October 22, 2026

From Knowledge Gaps to Coordinated Research
TimeAgenda Item
07:30 - 08:30Continental Breakfast
08:30 - 10:00

Lightning Talks on New Science Ideas

Participants will share emerging research, methods, questions, and project ideas related to central and northern Walker Lane through 3-minute presentations (1-3 slides each).

  1. Rich Briggs: 1987: COCORP deep seismic line across the Warm Springs Valley fault zone
  2. Florence Dadzoe: Post Earthquake Hazard impact
  3. Benchun Duan: Do we need and want physics-based EQ models for our SiERRa TAG? (PDF)
  4. John Louie: Terēan, providing subsurface intelligence (PDF)
  5. Heather Ford: ELVIS: A dense seismic deployment across Las Vegas Valley (PDF)
  6. Graham Kent (PDF)
  7. Rich Koehler: Geologic evidence for shear along the Petersen Mountain fault, North Valleys, Reno
  8. Grigorios Lavrentiadis: Connecting Ground Motion and Macroseismic Intensity: From Earthquake Scenarios to MMI and Back (PDF)
  9. Dana Marino: Geomorphic Fault Mapping in the Central-Northern Walker Lane (PDF)
  10. Judy Zachariasen: Evaluating Faults in the Truckee Area for Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
  11. Charles Trexler: USGS Earthquake Science Center Northern California Earthquake Geology Project
  12. Christie Rowe: Two fun-sized M5.7 earthquakes in the central Walker Lane (PDF)
  13. Clara Yoon: Relocated earthquakes and focal mechanisms near Lake Almanor, Northeastern California, reveal a connection at depth between larger mapped surface faults
  14. Seth Dee: The North Valleys Faults – Freds Mountain Fault Zone (PDF)
  15. Corné Kreemer: GNSS velocity profiles across the northern Walker Lane (PDF)
  16. Ian Pierce: Rates and Dates in Truckee
  17. Don Hoirup: CA DWR 2019 LiDAR Evaluation and Field Reconnaissance Key Findings
  18. Alex Hatem: 2020 M6.5 Monte Cristo Range earthquake
  19. Ahmed Elbanna: SiERRa: User-inspired fundamental research (PDF)
10:00 - 10:20Break
10:20 - 12:00

Working Group Session 1: Priorities and Opportunities

Participants assess current knowledge, identify critical gaps, and develop priority research needs.

12:00 - 13:00Lunch
13:00 - 15:00

Working Group Session 2: Priorities, Workplan, and Next Steps

Community discussion to identify cross-cutting priorities, opportunities for a multidisciplinary pilot study, earthquake-scenario needs, and areas requiring coordination across groups and organizations. Outline white paper to synthesize group discussions into concise recommendations and a SiERRa-TAG research work plan.

15:00 - 15:15Break
15:15 - 15:30

Closing Remarks

15:30Workshop Adjourns

Participants

The workshop brought together 47 participants from universities, government agencies, utilities, infrastructure organizations, emergency management, and the private sector. Participants represented expertise in earthquake geology, seismology, geodesy, ground-motion and site characterization, engineering, infrastructure resilience, and emergency response.

This broad interdisciplinary participation strengthened connections among the scientific, engineering, and stakeholder communities working across California and Nevada. It supported the development of a shared understanding of the region’s earthquake-risk challenges and helped identify coordinated priorities for research, hazard assessment, infrastructure resilience, and earthquake response.

* Remote Participant

Last NameFirst NameOrganization
BogolubKyrenNevada Seismo Lab
BriggsRichUSGS
CalderonKristinaDWR Division of Engineering Project Geology
*CallaghanScottUSC/SCEC
CarlsonChadCA Dept of Water Resources
ChiamaKristenUSC/SCEC
ConradKeithNV Division of Water Resources
DadzoeFlorenceUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst
DawsonTimothyCGS
DeeSethIndependent Consultant
DuanBenchunTexas A&M University
DunbarSeanCA DWR
DuRossChrisUSGS
ElbannaAhmedUSC/SCEC
FernandezCarlosUNR
FordHeatherUC Riverside
*GarciaDianaBGC Engineering
GreeneToddCSU Chico
GrossMayaNV Bureau of Mines and Geology, UNR
HammondBillUNR
*HatemAlexUSGS
HoirupDonCA Dept Water Resources (retired)
HuynhTranSCEC/USC
KentGrahamNevada Seismo Lab
KoehlerRichNV Bureau of Mines and Geology, UNR
KreemerCornéUNR
LavrentiadisGrigoriosUniversity at Buffalo
LouieJohnTer_an, Inc.
*MadugoChristopherPG&E
MarinoDanaUNR / NSL
MasonBenUNR
MotterSirenaUNR
OskinMichaelUC Davis
PierceIanPG&E
QuezadaKylieCSU Chico/PG&E
*ReitmanNadineUSGS
RosinskiAnneFEMA Region 9
RoweChristieNevada Seismo Lab
RutherfordRyanUNR
SavranWilliamNevada Seismo Lab
SeylabiElnazUNR
SmithKenUNR/NNSS
*TairaTaka'akiBerkeley Seismo Lab
TrexlerCharlesUSGS ESC
WilliamsRandyU.S. Bureau of Reclamation
YoonClaraUSGS
ZachariasenJudyCGS

Travel Support

The workshop was planned for approximately 40 in-person participants, selected through an application process based on their interests and potential contributions to the workshop objectives. Participants were expected to attend the full workshop and contribute to related activities and deliverables. Most arrived on October 19 and departed after the workshop concluded on October 22.
SCEC provided on-site lodging, meals, and complimentary group transportation between Reno-Tahoe International Airport (RNO) and the University of Nevada, Reno at Lake Tahoe campus. Participants were responsible for arranging and funding their travel to and from the Reno–Lake Tahoe area. RNO, approximately 30 miles from the campus in Incline Village, is the closest commercial airport.

SCEC Activities Code of Conduct

The Statewide California Earthquake Center (SCEC) fosters a diverse and inclusive community where everyone feels safe, productive, and welcome. We expect all participants in SCEC-supported events to uphold this commitment by adhering to the SCEC Activities Code of Conduct.

SCEC Meetings and Workshops

The SCEC Annual Meeting brings together 400-500 participants worldwide to share breakthroughs, assess progress, and chart a collaborative path for earthquake science. All of the Center activities are presented, analyzed, and woven into a set of priorities for SCEC to pursue in the future.

Coming Soon!

Questions? Contact us.

Applications are currently closed

Questions? Contact us.